Key Points
- OpenAI removes feature that allowed shared ChatGPT conversations to appear in search results
- Feature was based on chatbot’s link creation option with a discoverability toggle
- Thousands of conversations were being indexed by Google, sparking privacy concerns
- OpenAI cites accidental sharing of sensitive information as reason for removal
- Company’s chief information security officer initially defended feature’s labeling
A modal dialog box showing a public link sharing interface. The dialog contains a notification about a created public link, a checkbox option for making the chat discoverable, a URL field with a copy link button, and three social sharing buttons at the bottom for LinkedIn, Reddit, and X (formerly Twitter). The interface has a clean, modern design with a white background and a close button in the top-right corner.
Background
OpenAI had introduced a feature that enabled users to create shareable links to their ChatGPT conversations, with an option to make these conversations discoverable in search results. However, this feature sparked controversy when it was discovered that thousands of conversations were being indexed by Google, potentially revealing sensitive information.
The feature was notyar a result of a hack or leak, but rather a deliberate design choice by OpenAI. When creating a public link to a chat, users were presented with a pop-up option to “Make this chat discoverable”, which would allow it to be shown in web searches. Despite the option being clearly labeled, many users were unaware of the implications of making their conversations public.
Public Outcry and Response
The issue came to light after a report by Fast Company revealed that thousands of ChatGPT conversations were being indexed by Google. The report sparked widespread concern over potential privacy breaches, with many users expressing outrage over the fact that their conversations were being made public without their full understanding or consent.
In response to the outcry, OpenAI’s chief information security officer, Dane Stuckey, initially defended the feature’s labeling as “sufficiently clear”. However, as the controversy grew, the company ultimately decided to remove the feature, citing concerns over accidental sharing of sensitive information.
Source: engadget.com