Key Points
- Google developed SearchGuard to block automated access to its search results.
- SearchGuard was launched in January 2025 and targeted services like SerpApi.
- SerpApi allegedly used fake browsers and multiple IP addresses to appear human.
- Google claims SerpApi’s actions violate federal law and copyright protections.
- The lawsuit highlights the tension between data protection and web‑scraping services.
- A ruling could set important precedents for technology protection measures.
Background
Google has taken legal action against SerpApi, a service that provides automated access to its search results. The lawsuit centers on accusations that SerpApi deliberately circumvented Google’s protective measures to collect large volumes of search data and content from Google’s partners.
SearchGuard Implementation
In an effort to halt what it describes as harmful misappropriation and to safeguard partner relationships, Google developed and deployed a technological measure known as SearchGuard. This system restricts access to Google’s search results pages and the copyrighted material they contain. SearchGuard was launched in January 2025 and effectively blocked automated services, including SerpApi, from retrieving Google’s search data.
SerpApi’s Circumvention
According to the complaint, SerpApi quickly responded to the deployment of SearchGuard by creating methods to bypass the protection. The company allegedly masked hundreds of millions of automated queries each day, making them appear as if they originated from human users. SerpApi’s founder is quoted as describing the process as “creating fake browsers using a multitude of IP addresses that Google sees as normal users.” By employing these tactics, SerpApi is said to have evaded the technological safeguards that Google put in place.
Legal Action
Google’s lawsuit alleges that SerpApi’s actions constitute violations of federal law, including statutes that protect copyrighted content and prohibit the circumvention of technological protection measures. The complaint claims that each attempt by SerpApi to evade SearchGuard represented a separate violation, emphasizing the scale and systematic nature of the alleged wrongdoing.
Implications
The case underscores a broader conflict between major technology platforms that seek to control access to their data and third‑party services that rely on scraping that data for commercial purposes. If the court rules in Google’s favor, it could set a precedent that reinforces the enforceability of technical barriers like SearchGuard and potentially limit the operations of similar scraping services. Conversely, a decision against Google could embolden other companies to develop more sophisticated methods for bypassing protective technologies.
Source: theverge.com